 |
|
COMPLICATIONS OF LAP. INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
When a man says he is an experienced hernia
surgeon and has never had a recurrence, he is a
liar in one statement and probably in both.
|
Laparoscopic groin hernia repair
has 'Minimal Access but is not Minimally Invasive
overall complications are comparable if not lower than
open hernia repairs. The recurrence rates in literature
are - Open Hernia Repair 6.6 18%, Laparoscopic
Hernia Repair 7.0 19%, Recent Reports - 0.6%
with the potential for increased precision and effectiveness.
The majority of complications
are related to the laparoscopic technique.
VISCERAL
INJURIES
Testes
Testicular complications are far less common with laparoscopic
hernia repair (0.35.0%). because the 'laparoscopic-posterior'
repair does not involve that degree of dissection of
cord structures as 'open' repairs do. Yet, testicular
pain (most common), swelling, orchitis, epidydimitis
and atrophy can complicate the situation. The aetiology
of pain could be attributed to trauma to the genito-femoral
nerve or the sympathetic testicular plexus during 'parietalsation'
of the cord structures. Orchitis and epidydimitis are
due to extensive dissection .
Prevention
Atraumatic parietalisation of the cord structures, avoiding
complete removal of large indirect hernia sacs,careful
tightening of the internalring in paediatric patients.
Management
Supporting the testis,limiting the activity of the patient,
analgesics. Fortunately most of the complications resolve
spontaneously without sequelae.
Vas Deferens
Again complications are few with lap. hernia repair.
Transection injuries occur while transecting a redundant
large indirect sac,obstruction can result from traumatic
handling of the vas with instruments causing fibrosis.
BOWEL
INJURIES
These occur in three situations:
| 1. |
Freeing of
an incarcerated segment of bowel loop |
| 2.
|
Inadvertent
laceration of large bowel in the presence of a sliding
hernia |
| 3.
|
Injuries
to strangulated bowel (a contraindica-tion for the
laparosco-pic approach). |
The complications are Laceration
of bowel, trocar site herniae (commonly the Richter
type), adhesions resulting in acute obstruct-ion, Ileus
and chronic pain syndromes, bowel erosion by prosthesis,
entero-cutaneous fistulae, internal herniation of bowel
because of the 'shower curtain' effect, secondary to
failure of the peritoneum to remain anchored, leading
to acute obstruction.
Urinary Bladder
The urinary bladder can be injured (1.5 5 %) as it forms
the medial component of a sliding hernia. Types of bladder
morbidity are Bladder laceration (laceration should
be repaired in two layers), Retention, Infection and
Haematuria.
Bone
The use of staples and tackers into the ligament of
Cooper and underlying pubic ramus and tubercle may cause
Osteitis pubis .
Skin
Severe Ecchymoses is due to inadvertent injury to the
superficial vessels. Extensive subcutaneous emphysema
is due to pneumoperitoneum or pneumo- extraperitoneum
leaking into the subcutaneous plane at trocar sites.
Prevention
Avoiding repeated peritoneal perforations with trocars.
Therefore, self-retaining trocars are preffered. Fortunately
these complications are self-limiting and without serious
morbidity.
VASCULAR
INJURIES
Vascular morbidity could have different presentations:
| |
Haemorrhage (Most common)
|
| |
Vascular impairment -
Thrombosis, Embolisation, Gangrene |
| |
Delayed complications
- Stenosis, False aneurysm, Avfistula, Mesh Erosion
|
Vascular injury can occur
at the following sites:
| |
Deep Inferior Epigastric
vessels- occurs during dissection around the internal
inguinal ring, dissection while bringing down the
peritoneum in a TEP procedure. 'Clipping' the ends
of the injured vascular segment is the answer. |
| |
Spermatic vessels &
Deep Circumflex iliac vessels |
| |
Iliac artery and vein
in the Triangle of Doom could result in severe hemorrhage.
In the event of such a injury CONTROL the bleeding
PROMPTLY! PREVENT carbon dioxide embolism by compressing
the bleeding site!! |
| |
Obturator and aberrant
obturator vessels ('Artery of Death')- injured while
working in the 'Circle of Death/ Corona Mortis'. |
| |
Vessel in Dulucq's fascia
can be injured during lateral dissection. |
| |
Cremaster vessel injury
can cause scrotal haematomas. |
| |
Aorta |
| |
Venous injury in the space
of Bogros |
Haematomas could be in the wound, scrotum or retroperitoneum. |
LYMPHATIC
MORBIDITY
The incidence of background Seromas (1.2 10%) is higher
with laparoscopic than open repairs. These result from
trauma of dissection around the hernial sac and by foreign
bodies (eg. Prostheses)
Treatment
Most resolve spontaneously and need reassurance.
Aspiration is needed for those lasting more than 6-8
weeks and large seromas. Encysted seromas need excision.
HYDROCOELE
(0.6%)
These usually resolve spontaneously, occasionally simple
aspiration is necessary.
Nerve injury (12%)
TEP has been credited with having lower nerve injury
rates because extra-peritoneal exposure is better with
TEP. Causes are:
1. Failure to appreciate the anatomy
2. Difficulty in visualizing the nerves preperitoneally
3. Variable course of the nerves
4. Extensive preperitoneal dissection
5. Anchoring
The following three nerves
are at risk - Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve, Femoral
Branch of the Genito-Femoral Nerve, Intermediate Cutaneous
Br of the Femoral Nerve. Other three (Ilioinguinal,
Iliohypogastric and Genital Br of Genito-femoral nerve)
are usually not at risk but can be injured if excessive
pressure is applied during mesh fixation, compressing
the muscles enough to allow the staples to reach the
nerve.
|
MacFadyen notes that nerve entrapment by stapling
or suturing will cause pain lasting 6 months or
more!
|
Prevention
| 1. |
A good rule to follow
is to AVOID tacking/ stapling/ suturing below the
Iliopubic tract and lateral to the gonadal vessels
(namely the 'Trian-gle of Pain')!!! |
| 2. |
When laid in, prosthesis
should never be taut! Mesh shrinkage can be 20-50%
which can cause chronic pain syndromes. Secondly
the fibrotic scar can entrap nerves. |
Treatment
Rest, NSAIDS, Injections with local Anaesthetic or Corticosteroid.
Indications for operative treatment - neuralgia in the
recovery room (Immediate re-exploration), debilitating
and unremitting neuralgia.
INFECTIONS
(1 - 2%)
Can be Superficial subcutaneous - do not affect recurrence
rates or deep seated -associated with high recurrence
rates.
Treatment
A broad spectrum antibiotic is started during an observation
period of 4872 hours.
| |
If symptoms subside -
continue this for a week. |
| |
If the condition persists
or worsens -the wound should be opened, extra-peritoneally,
widely. |
| |
If progresses to a chronic
sinus, mesh infection should be suspected and treated
with - specific systemic antibiotics , wide opening
of the wound and removal of the mesh and all foreign
bodies including staples/ tacks/ sutures and necrotic
material. This is a demanding procedure as the mesh
is intimately adherent to the cord. Open hernia
repair is to be done at a later date. |
Prostheses related Complications
Mesh - infection, adhesions with viscera , erosion,
extrusion & migration, fibrosis causing nerve entrapment
and Enteric fistula.
PORT
SITE HERNIA
It is rare. Felix reported 0.63%. These are lower in
the TEP procedure.
Laparoscopic Hernia repair has a definite learning
curve and it needs surgeon interest and persistence
to overcome it. Reviewing of one's video tapes is
a useful and often crucial 'learning' modality,
in this regard!
|
RECURRENCE
Technical factors
- Learning curve
- Inadequate dissection
- Inadequate mesh size (60%)
- Slitting the mesh
- Improper mesh placement
- Mesh twisting / folding
- Mesh migration
- Inadequate mesh overlap of hernia defect
- Inadequate or lack of fixation (32%)
- Lifting of the mesh by haematoma, peritoneal strand,
etc.
- Missed herniae(15%)
- Missed lipoma
- Combination of the above( 30%)
Surgeon Factor
The problem is chiefly the lack of importance given
to hernia repair! Despite a poor record, abdominal wall
herniae continue to be repaired quite often by junior
level staff.
Although all surgeons must be prepared to
admit that recurrences will occur, the only proper
attitude to take is that any recurrence is the fault
of the surgeon. - M.M. Ravitch.
|
Reference
| 1. |
Mc Cormack et al, Laparoscopic
techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia
repair; EUHTC , Cochrane Review: Cochrane Library,
Issue 2, 2003, Oxford Update Software. |
| 2. |
Crawford DL et al, Laparoscopic
repair and groin hernia surgery, Surgical Clinics
of North America, Vol.78, no. 6, 1998;. |
| 3. |
Cost-effective, reliable
laparoscopic hernia repair: A report on 500 consecutive
repairs; Fazio FJ Jr.; Surgical Endoscopy 200; June;
16(60);. |
| 4. |
Incidence of complications
following laparoscopic hernio- plasty; Phillips
et al; Surgical Endoscopy 1995; 9: |
| 5. |
Surgical Anatomy of the
Inguinal Region and Lower Abdominal wall from the
Laparoscopic Perspective in The Anatomy of the Inguinal
region and its Relation to Groin Hernia; Ricardo
G. Annibali; Hernia 4th edition (Textbook); Nyhus
and Condon (Ed). |
| 6. |
Hernias and Abdominal
Wall defects; Daniel J. Scott and Daniel B. Jones;
Surgery: Basic Science and Clinical Excellence;
Norton, Bollinger, Chang, Lowry, Mulvihill, Pass,
Thompson (Ed); Springer 2000; |
|
|