|
|
Dr. Indu Bhatia
Director, Gynecologist &
Laparoscopic Surgeon
Dr. Archana Bajaj Dhawan
Gynecologist & Infertility Expert
Dr. Poonam Sharma
Gynecologic Associate
Global Fertility Centre, Global
Hospital and Endosurgery Institute
|
|
A 24 Years old unmarried girl was
referred to us from Dhaka, Bangladesh as a case of Primary
Amenorrhea. Physical examination revealed well developed secondary
sexual characteristics including normal breast development,
axillary and pubic hair. Serum FSH, LH, Testosterone and DHEAS
levels were all suggestive of female reproductive pattern.
Ultrasound revealed absent uterus, normal ovaries, normal
kidneys. Karyotype revealed normal female pattern.
Diagnostic Laparoscopy revealed:
| • |
Presence of bilateral rudimentary uterine cornua joined
together by a band. Normal looking fallopian tubes. Normal
ovaries. |
| • |
Bilateral round ligaments seen connecting to uterine
cornua & deep inguinal ring. |
| • |
Bilateral ureters were normal. |
| • |
Ovarian tissue sent for biopsy. |
Colposcopy & Hysteroscopy not
done.

Discussion
Congenital anomalies of mullerian system are common defects.
Incidence statistics differ from 1:4000 (at birth) to 1:20,000
(at hospital admission). Many are asymptomatic and therefore,
unrecognized.
Mayer (1829) described congenital absence of vagina found
in many stillbirths with multiple birth defects, Rokitansky
(1838) and Kuster (1910) described the same entity with absent
vagina, small bipartite uterus, normal ovarian and multi organ
anomalies. Hauser emphasized the spectrum of associated anomalies.
Over the years, the disorder has
come to be known as MAYER ROKITANSKY KUSTER HAUSER
(MRKH) syndrome. It is characterised by congenital
absence of vagina, primary amenorrhea, rudimentary cornua
uteri, morphologically normal ovaries and fallopian tubes.
Such patients have normal ovulation, normal breast development
and hair distribution with a 46 XX chromosomal
pattern. Polycystic ovaries & gonadal dysgenesis can occur,
hence positive need for ovarian biopsy.

MRKH syndrome occurs
due to failure of development and fusion of mullerian duct
system which occurs around the fifth gestational week. This
is possibly due to inappropriate production of mullerian regressive
factor (MIF) in female embryonic gonad, regional
absence or deficiency of estrogen receptors limited to lower
mullerian duct, effect of teratogenic agents or sporadic gene
mutation. It represents 15% cases of primary amenorrhea.
MRKH Syndrome is
frequently associated with urinary tract (47%), skeletal (12%)
& cardiac anomalies and inguinal hernia. Significant urinary
anomalies include unilateral renal agenesis, unilateral or
bilateral pelvic kidney, hydronephrosis, hydroureter and a
variety of patterns of ureteral duplication. An evaluation
of the urinary system is hence essential. Skeletal deformities
mostly involve the spine, but can involve digits and ribs
also.
Treatment
PRE OPERATIVE PREPARATION includes psychological
support of the patient to ensure her full co-operation. IVP
to assess the urinary system is mandatory. After laparoscopy
for confirming the diagnosis and ovarian biopsy, the aim is
to prepare a functional vagina. In cases associated with cyclical
pain, removal of the partly functional rudimentary horns may
be considered for pain relief.
There are several methods of surgical
correction including grafting of vaginal canal. Abbe-Wharton-McIndoe
operation techniques are the most common which involve split
thickness skin grafting. Timing of surgery is when the lady
is about to become sexually active. By doing the surgery at
an appropriate time, the lady does not use vaginal moulds
for very long time & risk of occlusion of neo vagina does
not exist.
Laparoscopic creation of Neo vagina
is achieved by applying pressure at the hymenal fossa with
the help of an olive. This olive is attached on the anterior
abdominal wall by traction sutures. So the traction applied
from above progressively pulls the olive up, and creates a
neo-vagina in the rectovesical space. The dilating olive and
traction device are removed after the neo-vagina progresses
to 6–7 cm depth. Thereafter, plastic moulds are required
for passive dilatation for 2 weeks. Neo-vagina gets covered
with stratified squamous epithelium in almost 80% after about
3 months of surgery. Laparoscopic creation

of neo-vagina appears to
be a safe, simple and effective method. The simplicity
comes from the fact that there is no dissection involved in
rectovesical space and secondly there is no need for skin
grafting. Efficacy has been proved by thorough follow up which
shows that laparoscopic creation of neo vagina gives anatomically
and functionally gratifying results. The patient will have
a normal sexual functioning after surgical reconstruction,
although conception cannot occur without the aid of a surrogate
mother.
Bibliography
| • |
Abbe R. New method of creating a vagina in a case of
congenital absence. Medical record 1898; 54: 836 |
| • |
Hauser GA, Keller M, Koller T. Das Rokitansky -Kuster
Syndrom. Uterus bipartitus solidus rudimentarius cum vagina
solida. Gynecologia 1961;151:111. |
| • |
Hauser GA, Schreiner WE. Das Mayer - Rokitansky -Kuster
Syndrom. Schweiz Med. Wochenschr 1961;91: 381. |
| • |
McIndoe AH. The treatment of congenital absence and
obliterative conditions of the vagina. Br. J Plast Surg.
1950;2: 254. |
| • |
McIndoe AH, Banister JB. An operation for the cure of
congenital absence of the vagina. J. Obstet Gynaecol.
Br. Emp. 1938; 45-490. |
| • |
Wharton LR. Congenital malformations associated with
developmental defects of the female reproductive organs.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1947; 53:37. |
| • |
Wharton LR. A simple method of constructing a vagina.
Ann Surg. 1938;107: 842 |
|